An meant function with security implications
Final 12 months security researchers from Bishop Fox discovered and reported 5 vulnerabilities within the Ray framework. Anyscale, the corporate that maintains the software program, determined to patch 4 of them (CVE-2023-6019, CVE-2023-6020, CVE-2023-6021 and CVE-2023-48023) in model 2.8.1, however claimed that the fifth one, assigned CVE-2023-48022, was probably not a vulnerability so it was left unfixed.
That’s as a result of CVE-2023-48022 is definitely straight brought on by the truth that the Ray dashboard and consumer API don’t implement authentication controls. So, any attacker who can attain the API endpoints can submit new jobs, delete present jobs, retrieve delicate data, and primarily obtain distant command execution.
The issue is, as a framework whose primary objective is to facilitate the execution of workloads throughout compute clusters, “distant command execution” is actually a function and the dearth of authentication can be by design. “As a result of Ray’s nature as a distributed execution framework, Ray’s security boundary is outdoors of the Ray cluster,” Anyscale mentioned in its advisory. “That’s the reason we emphasize that you have to forestall entry to your Ray cluster from untrusted machines (e.g., the general public web). This is the reason the fifth CVE (the dearth of authentication constructed into Ray) has not been addressed, and why it isn’t in our opinion a vulnerability, or perhaps a bug.”
The Ray documentation clearly states that “Ray expects to run in a secure community setting and to behave upon trusted code” and that it’s the duty of builders and platform suppliers to make sure these situations for secure operation. Nevertheless, as we’ve seen with different applied sciences up to now that lacked authentication by default, customers don’t at all times comply with greatest practices and insecure deployments will make their manner on the web ultimately. Whereas Anyscale doesn’t need customers to place all their belief in an isolation management like authentication inside Ray as a substitute of isolating the whole framework and clusters with exterior controls, it has determined to work on including an authentication mechanism in future variations.
Insecure-by-default configurations
Till then, nevertheless, many organizations are prone to proceed to unwillingly expose such servers to the web as a result of, in keeping with Oligo, many deployment guides and repositories for Ray, together with among the official ones, include insecure deployment configurations. Misconfigurations are additionally made simpler by the truth that by default the Ray dashboard and the Jobs API binds to 0.0.0.0, which principally means all accessible community interfaces on a system and opens port forwarding within the firewall to all of them.
“AI consultants are NOT security consultants—leaving them probably dangerously unaware of the very actual dangers posed by AI frameworks,” the researchers mentioned. “With out authorization for Ray’s Jobs API, the API may be uncovered to distant code execution assaults when not following greatest practices.”
