Specify security necessities utilizing the developer’s format
Use the builders’ format (person tales, software program requirement specs, story mapping, wireframes, personas, and use circumstances) to articulate security necessities in order that builders can higher perceive, outline, and implement security specs.
This permits security necessities to be handled as purposeful necessities within the product backlog, reworking them into duties (a.ok.a. decomposition), incorporating them into necessities administration instruments and together with them within the undertaking’s productiveness metrics (corresponding to burndown and velocity).
Conduct risk modeling
Conduct common risk modeling workout routines to know the security context of the appliance, to uncover elements of the design that aren’t safe, to determine, analyze, and prioritize threats; to find the commonest strategies and strategies used to assault the appliance (spoofing, tampering, denial of companies, escalation of privilege), to determine which threats warrant further security testing and most significantly, to supply methods and options to mitigate every risk proactively.
Make use of safe programming strategies
Mandate builders to leverage established safe programming strategies corresponding to pair programming, refactoring, steady enchancment/steady growth (CI/CD), peer assessment, security iterations and test-driven growth.
This improves the non-functional qualities of the appliance code and helps take away programming defects that permit security vulnerabilities to be exploited. Safe programming strategies are additionally helpful in directing builders who’re inexperienced at safe strategies, utilizing new applied sciences like AI or low-code/no-code, creating a facet of an utility that’s complicated, integrating third-party functions, or assembly compliance necessities.
Carry out unbiased security critiques
Get unbiased reviewers to carry out static code evaluation (assessment supply code to research errors, bugs, and loopholes within the utility code) and dynamic evaluation (study utility habits throughout execution to determine uncommon or surprising habits). This offers assurance to stakeholders that the appliance meets security necessities and doesn’t embody any security vulnerabilities.
